CONNECT WITH US

We're not as good at investing as we think we are...

Of all the behavioral biases that hamper our performance as investors, arguably the most pervasive — and the most destructive — is overconfidence. Research has repeatedly shown that most people (and especially men) overestimate their investment skill. 

Confidence serves humans well in so many ways. But too much of it can have very adverse effects, and investing is a perfect example. Overconfidence tricks us into losing sight of the fact that we cannot expect to outsmart the collective wisdom of the market consistently, especially after costs.

Blog Post 1080x1080 (Blog)

In a 1998 study called "Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?, Terrance Odean, professor of finance at the University o

f California, Berkeley, looked at the activity of 10,000 brokerage accounts. His analysis showed that investors habitually overestimated the profit potential of the stock trades they made. In reality, the profits they made typically didn’t even cover their transaction costs and, on average, the stocks investors bought underperformed the stocks they sold.

There is often a link between overconfidence and excessive trading. Two years after his first study, Odean published a follow-up paper, co-authored with Brad Barber, entitled "Trading is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Investment Performance of Individual Investors. For that study they analyzed more than 66,000 individual trading accounts. Between 1991 and 1996, they found, investors who traded most earned annualized returns of 11.4%, but over that same period the market earned annualized returns of 17.9%.

Odean’s findings are entirely consistent with those of similar studies. For example, a study called Positive Illusions and Forecasting Errors in Mutual Fund Investment Decisions found that investors tend to inflate both their future and past performance. More than a third who believed that they had beaten the market had actually underperformed by at least 5%. A more recent study by Kent Daniel and David Hirshleifer also identified a very strong link between overconfidence on the one hand and excessive trading and lower returns on the other.

We should not be at all surprised that most individual investors underperform the market. Think about it. Most of us tend to think we’re better than, say, the average driver. But, by definition, only half of us can be better than average at anything. The logical conclusion, then, is that a high proportion of those who consider themselves "above average" are in fact below it — and blissfully unaware of their lack of competence.

So, for example, investors will read a book, or a few articles in the money pages, and they suddenly think they have an edge over their fellow investors. Yet financial markets reflect the opinions of millions of traders around the world; they incorporate new information into prices within milliseconds. It’s completely unrealistic for an amateur investor to assume they have some vital knowledge or insight that no one else possesses.

In fact, though, there is another important reason why it’s completely irrational for a typical investor to think that they can outperform the market consistently. Whereas, in the past, there were large numbers of non-professional investors trading stocks, nowadays around 95% of trading is either done by professional investors (or computers with algorithms designed by professional investors). These professionals are generally highly skilled and intelligent and have access to the very latest information and research. It is very unlikely that someone who doesn’t work full-time in investment management and doesn’t have those sorts of resources at their disposal will consistently have an edge over those who do it for a living.

To quote the investment author William Bernstein, "trading stocks is like playing tennis against an invisible opponent; what the investor doesn't realize is that he's volleying with the Williams sisters.”

OK, you might say, I personally don’t have the skill to pick stocks, or to choose when to buy and sell, but I think I can find someone who does. Again, let’s look at that rationally.

The asset management management industry has ballooned in size over the last 30 years. There are hundreds of thousands of active fund managers today, and they’re all competing against one another for a finite amount of alpha, or excess returns. It’s no wonder that only a tiny fraction of them are able to outperform consistently after costs.

The scale of the task fund managers face is brilliantly explained by Larry Swedroe in his book, The Incredible Shrinking Alpha, in which he uses, appropriately, another tennis analogy. 

At the height of his powers, says Swedroe, Roger Federer was the greatest tennis player of his era. That was despite Andy Roddick having a better serve, Andy Murray a better backhand, Rafael Nadal a better baseline game and so on.

Yet while Federer’s opponents were other tennis players, fund managers aren’t just up against the Murrays and Nadals of the stock picking world; no, they’re attempting to outwit a far more formidable opponent, namely the collective wisdom of the entire market.

It’s as if, Swedroe says, each time Federer stepped on court he faced an opponent with Roddick’s serve, Murray’s backhand and Nadal’s skill at the baseline. If that had been the case he may never have won a single tournament.

The bottom line is that however good we think we are at tennis or anything else, we can’t all be better than average. Investors, then, need to beware of overconfidence, when it comes to investing, investors should avoid competing in markets in active ways and instead utilize passive strategies based on evidence and that are not reliant on exit timing.

 

Sources

"Are Investors Reluctant to Realize Their Losses?" by Terrance Odean

"Trading Is Hazardous to Your Wealth: The Common Stock Investment Performance of Individual Investors" by Brad M. Barber and Terrance Odean

"Positive Illusions and Forecasting Errors in Mutual Fund Investment Decisions" by DA Moore, TR Kurtzberg, CR Fox, MH Bazerman

"Overconfident Investors, Predictable Returns, and Excessive Trading" by Kent Daniel and David Hirshleifer

Behavior: Fear

Investing Essentials: The Different Asset Classes

Interview: How much is enough?

We're not as good at investing as we think we are...

WealthFactor Review & Update: February 2021

Rethinking the value of wealth services

You'd Be Amazed at How Superstitious Investors Are

Interview: Risk Capacity

WealthFactor Review & Update: January 2021

What is evidence-based investing?

WealthFactor Review & Update: December 2020

"Don't just do something. Stand there!"

Interview: Does the financial media help or hurt?

Digital Wealth Management - Launch Announcement

Letting fear lead investment decisions can be costly

WealthFactor Review & Update: November 2020

Not all Advisors are Equal

Successful Investing Is Dull

Complexity Adds to Cost and Risk

WealthFactor October 2020 Review

Reducing market volatility through diversification

Taking a RiskSmart efficiency centric approach to investing.

It’s important to keep the link between wealth and happiness in mind.

September 2020 Review Replay

Preparing for your work-optional stage isn't just financial

August 2020 Review Replay

Webinar Replay: Introduction to Direct Indexing

Using Options for Income

Behavioral Investing Mistakes: Chasing Trends

July 2020 Review Replay

Emotional Investing Mistakes: Attention Span

Retail Investor Rises Again

Emotional Investing Mistakes: Regret

Perspective on Recessions

June 2020 Review Replay

Be Ready for Declines

There is always a reason not to invest

RiskSmart Webinar Replay

Don't work with professionals in the mirage building business.

Your Financial Advisor Has Too Many Clients

May 2020 Review Replay

Be Skeptical of the Investment Media

Beware of Overconfidence Bias

11 Ways Wall Street Gets Paid

Webinar Replay: An Introduction to Direct Indexing

What’s your number?

Refocus: What’s Wall Street Selling Today?

Do You Have a Plan for Getting Punched in the Face?

Financial Planning Matters. But...

WealthFactor April 2020 Review

Refocus 5-8-2020

2020 Berkshire Shareholder Meeting Key Takeaways

Why High Fees Hurt So Much

Refocus 5-1-2020

Introduction to Direct Indexing

Webinar: A Guide to RiskSmart Investing

Refocus 4-24-2020

Overview: PortfolioSmart

Overview: TaxSmart

Overview: FeeSmart

Overview: RiskSmart Investing

Webinar: The Critical Importance of an Investment Plan

Maximizing Opportunity with an Investment Plan - Part 3

The Critical Importance of having an Investment Plan Part #2:

Its time to turn off CNBC and create a plan.

1st Quarter 2020 Review Webinar Review

Why are you paying more and increasing your risk?

High Fees Are Hurting Your Investment Portfolio More Than the Coronavirus.

Pandemic Investing in 3 Parts: How to Navigate the Current Situation.

Four Behaviors Successful Investors Avoid

Are One of the Investors Who Underperform Passive Investing

Do You Invest With Your Emotions?

How should you invest?

Are You Paying Too Much For Investment Advice?

Have Questions? Do You Like Coffee?

Should You Use Funds or Stocks In Your Portfolio?

Commentary: Passive Investing Trends

Review & React: Goldman Sachs Fee Schedule!

Coffee Talk - Open Investment Q & A

Review & React: A Morgan Stanley Investment Proposal

RiskSmart Investing: Portfolio Efficiency

2019 Market and Investor Insights

RiskSmart Investing with WealthFactor

RiskSmart Investing with WealthFactor

Thank you to the Lake Oswego Review

New Addition to the WealthFactor Team

Quarterly Investor Insights

Sample - How To Post

Welcome to WealthFactor

Fed Intervenes in Banking Rate

Now You Can Blog from Everywhere!

Does your investment professional have history?

1st Quarter 2019 Insights

Keys To Investing Success

Tax-Smart Investors Avoid Mutual Funds

2018 Year-End Market Insights

Avoid Premium Prices for Commodity Services

2018 Mid-Year Market Insights

Ask your Adviser for a Discount

Index Investing Enhanced

Avoid Annuities

Avoid Excessive Risks With Bonds

FAANG Stocks are Adding Risk